Dr. Sanity: THE POLIITICAL LEFT: UNITED IN HATE WITH AMERICA’S FOES

You are viewing an old revision of this post, from April 21, 2009 @ 19:47:12. See below for differences between this version and the current revision.

 This is amazing.

All four of these strategies arose from the metaphysical, epistemological and ethical dead-end that traditional Marxism found itself in toward the end of the 20th century. Fortunately, postmodern philosophy has led them out of the "wilderness" of rational thought and objective reality, and brought them to the promised land; which, as it turns out, is a neo-Marxist revival, accelerated by the fascist goals of leftist environmentalism.

I don’t even know where to begin.

On a side note, isn’t fascism incompatible with communism? How can you have, on the one hand, neo-Marxism, while on the other fascist environmentalism? What does fascist environmentalism even look like?

The intellectuals of the left have been unable to abandon their totalitarian/collectivist ideology, even after communism and national socialism proved to be crushing failures in the 20th century.(emphasis added)

Totalitarianism and collectivism are fundamentally different. Communism and national socialism (e.g. Nazi-ism) are opposites. Both are meant to be leftist ideologies? Really?

Last time I checked (which, admittedly, was in High School), you had communism on one end, and fascism (Nazis) on the other. Democrats and Republicans were in the middle, with the former tending to the left (communism) and the latter tending to the right (fascism).

Combining communism and Nazism and labeling them as Leftist ideologies seems, to me, to be quite revisionist.

But the new face of their same old tired ideas has been rehabilitated and madeover by their clever adoption of postmodern metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Slowly, but relentlessly, the dogma of multiculturalism and political correctness has been absorbed at all levels of Western culture in the last two decades–and after the end of the cold war, it has been accelerating. Slowly but relentlessly they have found new ways to discredit freedom, individuality and capitalism.
The new face of collectivist and totalitarian thought has been seamlessly integrated into most K-12 curricula and all other learning environments. have been at the forefront of attempts by leading academics and academic institutions to rewrite most of history and undo thousands of years of Western cultural advancement. (emphasis added)

IT’S A CONSPIRACY!

Not only is leftist ideology “postmodern”, with the use of postmodern as an adjective implying that it’s a pejorative label, but there’s a decades-long conspiracy in academia to rewrite history to be anti-American.

Wait, was that a little strong?

No, I don’t think so:

If the left understands anything, it is that in order for their ideology and its promised utopia to be born, they must thoroughly destroy America and undermine everything America stands for in the world.

The Left is acting against America. The Left is anti-American. Wait, what is American? Obviously, it must be whatever the Left stands against – e.g. Republicans. Republicans therefore must be the “real” Americans.

The only logical conclusion, of course, is that Obama isn’t a real American President:

Obama’s behavior now as President is not any different than it was when he was a mere community organizer. The people he associated with then, he continues to associate with; only now he is able to appoint them to key roles in the U.S. government. He has been a member of the New Socialist Party and enjoyed their support when he ran for office; he hobnobbed with former terrorists who are now "education experts"; and his wife and many of his friends and close associates at work and church never liked America much to begin with. (emphasis added)

So how was Obama elected, then?

Yet, he is the candidate who the majority of Americans voted for; and I can’t blame them entirely because essential information was kept from the general population by the media about Obama’s character

Yes, it was the media’s fault. Again. Why does Fox News continue to fail the Republican party? Why?

Did I mention that the point of the article was to explain why Leftist ideals are compatible with an alliance with Militant Islam?

I’m not even going to touch that.

But please, check it out. It’s a truly amazing piece of writing; one doesn’t often come across that level of delusion.

Post Revisions:

Changes:

April 21, 2009 @ 19:47:12Current Revision
Content
<p>&#160;<a title="This is amazing" href="http:// drsanity.blogspot.com/2009/ 04/poliitical- left-united- in-hate-with.html">This is amazing</a>.</p> <blockquote> <p>All four of these strategies arose from the metaphysical, epistemological and ethical dead-end that traditional Marxism found itself in toward the end of the 20th century. Fortunately, postmodern philosophy has led them out of the &quot;wilderness&quot; of rational thought and objective reality, and brought them to the promised land; which, as it turns out, is a neo-Marxist revival, accelerated by the fascist goals of leftist environmentalism.</p> </blockquote> <p>I don’t even know where to begin. </p> <p>On a side note, isn’t fascism incompatible with communism? How can you have, on the one hand, neo-Marxism, while on the other fascist environmentalism? What does fascist environmentalism even look like?</p> <blockquote> <p>The intellectuals of the left have been unable to abandon their totalitarian/ collectivist ideology, even after <strong>communism </strong>and <strong>national socialism </strong>proved to be crushing failures in the 20th century.(<em>emphasis added</em>)</p> </blockquote> <p>Totalitarianism and collectivism are fundamentally different. Communism and national socialism (e.g. Nazi-ism) are opposites. <em>Both</em> are meant to be leftist ideologies? Really?</p> <p>Last time I checked (which, admittedly, was in High School), you had communism on one end, and fascism (Nazis) on the other. Democrats and Republicans were in the middle, with the former tending to the left (communism) and the latter tending to the right (fascism).</p> <p>Combining communism and Nazism and labeling them as Leftist ideologies seems, to me, to be quite revisionist.</p> <blockquote> <p>But the new face of their same old tired ideas has been rehabilitated and madeover by their clever adoption of postmodern metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Slowly, but relentlessly, the dogma of multiculturalism and political correctness has been absorbed at all levels of Western culture in the last two decades--and after the end of the cold war, it has been accelerating. Slowly but relentlessly they have found new ways to discredit freedom, individuality and capitalism. <br />The new face of collectivist and totalitarian thought has been <strong>seamlessly integrated into most K-12 curricula and all other learning environments</strong>. have been at the forefront of attempts by leading academics and academic institutions to <strong>rewrite most of history and undo thousands of years of Western cultural advancement</strong>. (<em>emphasis added</em>)</p> </blockquote> <p>IT’S A CONSPIRACY!</p> <p>Not only is leftist ideology “postmodern”, with the use of postmodern as an adjective implying that it’s a pejorative label, but there’s a decades-long conspiracy in academia to rewrite history to be <em>anti-American</em>.</p> <p>Wait, was that a little strong?</p> <p>No, I don’t think so:</p> <blockquote> <p>If the left understands anything, it is that in order for their ideology and its promised utopia to be born, <strong>they must thoroughly destroy America </strong>and undermine everything America stands for in the world.</p> </blockquote> <p>The Left is acting <em>against America</em>. The Left is <em>anti-American</em>. Wait, what is American? Obviously, it must be whatever the Left stands against – e.g. Republicans. Republicans therefore <em>must</em> be the “real” Americans.</p> <p>The only logical conclusion, of course, is that Obama isn’t a <em>real American President</em>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Obama's behavior now as President is not any different than it was when he was a <strong>mere community organizer</strong>. The people he associated with then, he continues to associate with; only now he is able to appoint them to key roles in the U.S. government. He has been a <strong>member of the New Socialist Party </strong>and enjoyed their support when he ran for office; he <strong>hobnobbed with former terrorists </strong>who are now &quot;education experts&quot;; and <strong>his wife and many of his friends and close associates at work and church never liked America much to begin with</strong>. (<em>emphasis added</em>)</p> </blockquote> <p>So how was Obama elected, then?</p> <blockquote> <p>Yet, he is the candidate who the majority of Americans voted for; and I <strong>can't blame them entirely </strong>because essential information was kept from the general population <strong>by the media </strong>about Obama's character</p> </blockquote> <p>Yes, it was the media’s fault. <em>Again</em>. Why does Fox News continue to fail the Republican party? <em>Why? </em></p> <p>Did I mention that the point of the article was to explain why Leftist ideals are compatible with an alliance with Militant Islam? </p> <p>I’m not even going to touch that.</p> <p>But please, check it out. It’s a truly amazing piece of writing; one doesn’t often come across that level of delusion.</p>  <p>&#160;<a title="This is amazing" href="http:// drsanity.blogspot.com/2009/ 04/poliitical- left-united- in-hate-with.html">This is amazing</a>.</p> <blockquote> <p>All four of these strategies arose from the metaphysical, epistemological and ethical dead-end that traditional Marxism found itself in toward the end of the 20th century. Fortunately, postmodern philosophy has led them out of the &quot;wilderness&quot; of rational thought and objective reality, and brought them to the promised land; which, as it turns out, is a neo-Marxist revival, accelerated by the fascist goals of leftist environmentalism.</p> </blockquote> <p>I don’t even know where to begin. </p> <p>On a side note, isn’t fascism incompatible with communism? How can you have, on the one hand, neo-Marxism, while on the other fascist environmentalism? What does fascist environmentalism even look like?</p> <blockquote> <p>The intellectuals of the left have been unable to abandon their totalitarian/ collectivist ideology, even after <strong>communism </strong>and <strong>national socialism </strong>proved to be crushing failures in the 20th century.(<em>emphasis added</em>)</p> </blockquote> <p>Totalitarianism and collectivism are fundamentally different. Communism and national socialism (e.g. Nazi-ism) are opposites. <em>Both</em> are meant to be leftist ideologies? Really?</p> <p>Last time I checked (which, admittedly, was in High School), you had communism on one end, and fascism (Nazis) on the other. Democrats and Republicans were in the middle, with the former tending to the left (communism) and the latter tending to the right (fascism).</p> <p>Combining communism and Nazism and labeling them as Leftist ideologies seems, to me, to be quite revisionist.</p> <blockquote> <p>But the new face of their same old tired ideas has been rehabilitated and madeover by their clever adoption of postmodern metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics. Slowly, but relentlessly, the dogma of multiculturalism and political correctness has been absorbed at all levels of Western culture in the last two decades--and after the end of the cold war, it has been accelerating. Slowly but relentlessly they have found new ways to discredit freedom, individuality and capitalism. <br />The new face of collectivist and totalitarian thought has been <strong>seamlessly integrated into most K-12 curricula and all other learning environments</strong>. have been at the forefront of attempts by leading academics and academic institutions to <strong>rewrite most of history and undo thousands of years of Western cultural advancement</strong>. (<em>emphasis added</em>)</p> </blockquote> <p>IT’S A CONSPIRACY!</p> <p>Not only is leftist ideology “postmodern”, with the use of postmodern as an adjective implying that it’s a pejorative label, but there’s a decades-long conspiracy in academia to rewrite history to be <em>anti-American</em>.</p> <p>Wait, was that a little strong?</p> <p>No, I don’t think so:</p> <blockquote> <p>If the left understands anything, it is that in order for their ideology and its promised utopia to be born, <strong>they must thoroughly destroy America </strong>and undermine everything America stands for in the world.</p> </blockquote> <p>The Left is acting <em>against America</em>. The Left is <em>anti-American</em>. Wait, what is American? Obviously, it must be whatever the Left stands against – e.g. Republicans. Republicans therefore <em>must</em> be the “real” Americans.</p> <p>The only logical conclusion, of course, is that Obama isn’t a <em>real American President</em>:</p> <blockquote> <p>Obama's behavior now as President is not any different than it was when he was a <strong>mere community organizer</strong>. The people he associated with then, he continues to associate with; only now he is able to appoint them to key roles in the U.S. government. He has been a <strong>member of the New Socialist Party </strong>and enjoyed their support when he ran for office; he <strong>hobnobbed with former terrorists </strong>who are now &quot;education experts&quot;; and <strong>his wife and many of his friends and close associates at work and church never liked America much to begin with</strong>. (<em>emphasis added</em>)</p> </blockquote> <p>So how was Obama elected, then?</p> <blockquote> <p>Yet, he is the candidate who the majority of Americans voted for; and I <strong>can't blame them entirely </strong>because essential information was kept from the general population <strong>by the media </strong>about Obama's character</p> </blockquote> <p>Yes, it was the media’s fault. <em>Again</em>. Why does Fox News continue to fail the Republican party? <em>Why? </em></p> <p>Did I mention that the point of the article was to explain why Leftist ideals are compatible with an alliance with Militant Islam? </p> <p>I’m not even going to touch that.</p> <p>But please, check it out. It’s a truly amazing piece of writing; one doesn’t often come across that level of delusion.</p> <p>Let me leave you with this chart:</p> <p><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" border="0" src="http://i2.photobucket.com/ albums/y23/drsanity/ SocialismPostmodernism.gif" width="350" height="467" /></p>

Note: Spaces may be added to comparison text to allow better line wrapping.